- Aim for a ranking confidence of 9.9 or higher.
- Ranking confidence may experience sudden changes while new arguments are being submitted during the argument submission period.
- Investigating a controversial topic is governed by two deadlines: The Argument Submission Deadline and the Argument Evaluation Deadline
- The Argument Submission Deadline is the cutoff point for users to submit their arguments. However, users can continue to evaluate existing arguments until the Argument Evaluation Deadline. The time gap between the two deadlines allows for the assessment of all submitted arguments. (Learn more)
Can Morality Exist Without Religion?
Anonymous
Submitter
May 21, 2025, 05:53 PM UTC
Submission Time
Sep 01, 2025, 05:53 PM UTC
Argument Submission Deadline
Nov 01, 2025, 05:53 PM UTC
Argument Evaluation Deadline
passkey
Public
Access Setting
This question explores whether moral values and ethical behavior can be fully established and maintained without relying on religious doctrines or belief in a divine being. It considers whether religion is necessary to define what is right and wrong, or whether secular frameworks—such as reason, empathy, societal norms, or evolutionary psychology—can independently sustain a moral system.
Viewpoint 1/2
Anonymous
Submitter
May 21, 2025, 05:53 PM UTC
Submission Time
3 Arguments, 0 Evaluations
Total Numbers of Submitted Arguments and Argument Evaluations
Ranking Confidence: 0/10
Current Confidence in the Ranking of Submitted Arguments
Without a divine lawgiver, moral values lack an absolute, unchanging foundation. In a purely secular or naturalistic world, moral principles become subjective, changing with time, culture, or personal opinion. Religion anchors morality in the eternal nature or commands of a divine being, providing a universal standard that transcends individual or societal preferences.
Philosophers like Immanuel Kant and John Rawls have shown that rational consistency and human dignity can provide a stable basis for moral objectivity without invoking the divine. Objective norms can emerge from shared human conditions, not just religious authority.
wb_incandescent
Religion Provides Motivation for Moral Behavior
Current Top Argument 2for Viewpoint 1
Religious belief offers powerful incentives for moral conduct—such as divine reward (e.g., heaven) and punishment (e.g., hell). For many, this system encourages accountability, especially in situations where secular consequences are absent.
Acting morally due to fear of divine punishment may reflect obedience, not ethical virtue. True morality requires internal motivation, such as empathy or rational reflection—not just fear-based compliance.
wb_incandescent
Historical Role of Religion in Moral Movements
Current Top Argument 3for Viewpoint 1
The U.S. Civil Rights Movement was led by religious leaders and grounded in *Christian ethics*. See Stanford’s King Institute for historical examples.
Religious institutions have at times endorsed slavery or opposed civil rights. See BBC Ethics Guide on Religion and Slavery.
refreshLoad More
{{ (total_arguments_per_viewpoint[ "0" ] - allowed_arguments_per_viewpoint[ "0" ]).toLocaleString() }} more Argument(s) are available
close_fullscreenMinimize
Back to the first {{ initially_allowed_arguments_per_viewpoint }} Arguments
Previous Viewpoint
Next Viewpoint
Viewpoint 2/2
Anonymous
Submitter
May 21, 2025, 05:53 PM UTC
Submission Time
4 Arguments, 0 Evaluations
Total Numbers of Submitted Arguments and Argument Evaluations
Ranking Confidence: 0/10
Current Confidence in the Ranking of Submitted Arguments
wb_incandescent
Ethical Principles Can Be Derived from Reason and Empathy
Current Top Argument 1for Viewpoint 2
Moral behavior can emerge from rational thought, social contracts, and empathy. Philosophers like Kant, Mill, and Rawls have demonstrated how universalizable principles and human flourishing can ground ethical systems without invoking the divine.
Even if reason helps define ethics, it may not compel moral behavior. People often know what’s right but act otherwise—religious belief can add a motivational layer that reason lacks.
wb_incandescent
Morality Can Emerge Through Evolutionary and Social Processes
Current Top Argument 2for Viewpoint 2
Evolutionary biologists argue that morality has adaptive advantages. See Scientific American for insights on the evolutionary basis of morality.
Just because behaviors evolved doesn’t mean they are morally right. Evolution might explain why we cooperate, but not why we ought to—which is a philosophical, not biological, question.
Research from the World Values Survey and Pew confirms that secular nations maintain strong ethical standards. See Pew Research on Religion and Morality.
Many secular societies were historically shaped by religious ethics. Their current moral standards may still reflect residual religious influence even if explicit belief has waned.
Research by primatologist Frans de Waal documents moral behavior in animals. See Nature: The Evolution of Empathy.
Animal cooperation may resemble morality, but it lacks intentional ethical reasoning. Human morality involves reflection, choice, and justification, which animals do not demonstrate.
refreshLoad More
{{ (total_arguments_per_viewpoint[ "1" ] - allowed_arguments_per_viewpoint[ "1" ]).toLocaleString() }} more Argument(s) are available
close_fullscreenMinimize
Back to the first {{ initially_allowed_arguments_per_viewpoint }} Arguments
Previous Viewpoint
Next Viewpoint