Strength Evaluation
Which of the following two arguments is stronger?

Please compare the strength of the two arguments below, ignoring all others.

Note. The platform identifies the top arguments for each viewpoint independently of others. This implies that the competition occurs among arguments supporting the same viewpoint.

Argument A

Sanctions have a far-reaching impact on society compared to military operations, affecting the lives of countless innocent people. These measures make it challenging for almost everyone in society to carry on with their daily routines, leading to a decline in their standard of living. The negative impact resulting from a shortage of crucial resources like food and medicine can persist for several decades.

Argument B

Sanctions have a more prolonged impact compared to wars. While wars are undoubtedly horrendous, their effects often cease when the conflict ends. But the consequences of sanctions are often longer-lasting. Some consequences of sanctions, such as malnutrition among children or untreated (or under-treated) medical conditions due to a lack of necessary medications, may manifest themselves over several decades.

Overview