Strength Evaluation
Which of the following two arguments is stronger?

Please compare the strength of the two arguments below, ignoring all others.

Note. The platform identifies the top arguments for each viewpoint independently of others. This implies that the competition occurs among arguments supporting the same viewpoint.

Argument A

October 7 would have never happened if it weren't for the deeply oppressive policies undertaken by the Israeli government over the past decades. This includes the complete blockade of Gaza, the expansion of unlawful settlements in the West Bank despite U.S. objections, and regular provocations at Masjid Al-Aqsa—a site sacred to Muslims. These places are part of Palestine, and Gazans consider them their homeland, as reflected in the name of the operation, “Al-Aqsa Storm.” Therefore, one cannot claim that such violations are unrelated to the events of October 7.

Israelis often cite security concerns to justify their actions. However, seizing other people's land is blatantly illegal (also see this) and is not self-defense. It will make bad precedent if countries start to occupy other countries and start making settlements there in the name of self-defense.

Argument B

Israeli officials publicly cut off electricity and water supplies to Gaza soon after October 7th. Additionally, according to reputable international organizations, food supplies to Gaza have been significantly reduced, with aid groups citing difficulty coordinating with the Israeli military as the primary reason (see here for more evidence). Some Israeli citizens have also attempted to block aid trucks. These limited food supplies have led to the starvation and deaths of many innocent people, particularly vulnerable children. In effect, the IDF has used starvation as a weapon of war against Gazans.

These policies clearly constitute "collective punishment", which is strictly prohibited under international law. It is important to note that the popular Israeli argument of "collateral damage" does not even apply in this case.

Israeli officials have attempted to cast doubt on claims of a food shortage in Gaza. They cite certain "studies" and "images" showing overweight individuals. It's important to note that all such studies originate from Israeli sources, not independent ones. As for the images, they should be weighed against the many more photos emerging from Gaza that show visibly malnourished individuals. Ultimately, if the Israeli government is confident there is no food shortage, one must ask: why not allow international journalists in to see for themselves?

Source: Middle East Eye/AFP/Omar al-Qattaa

Overview