The audience often doesn't have time to follow repetitive, drawn-out exchanges—that’s the problem nlite aims to solve: making the investigation of controversial topics more efficient.

To address the point raised, however, the platform has implemented a thoughtful mechanism. When an argument is challenged by a counterargument, the platform notifies the argument submitter, who is then given the opportunity to revise their argument within certain limits (they may add new content but cannot make significant changes to existing content).

If the argument is updated, the counterargument submitter is notified and given a chance to revise their submission. If they choose to do so, the original argument submitter receives a notification again, and the process can continue iteratively.

While this system places some additional responsibility on the two parties involved in the discussion, it greatly benefits the undecided audience, who no longer need to follow lengthy discussion threads.  Instead, they get to see well-polished and concise argument–counterargument pairs. (This tradeoff is generally acceptable, as those submitting arguments and counterarguments are often highly motivated to inform others.)

Notably, the platform marks all changes with color highlights and strikethroughs, allowing the two parties to quickly grasp what has been added or modified by the other side.