The following Argument has been submitted for the Viewpoint above.
wb_incandescent
LLMs can already generate top arguments quickly, making platforms like nlite unnecessary

Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly improving in their ability to reason and conduct research. With these advancements, it's possible to generate high-quality arguments more efficiently and without relying on crowdsourced input—making platforms like nlite less necessary.

The following Counters have been submitted to the Argument above.
error
The nuance provided by human experts remains unmatched

Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful tools for summarizing data on well-studied topics. However, they are not good at reasoning about new topics that constantly emerge in our societies, which may not be well-represented in their training data and may also be hard to collect real-time data for.

Additionally, LLMs fall short if the data available for a topic on the internet is biased, for example, when certain viewpoints are under-represented online.

At present, LLMs also suffer from the hallucination problem, meaning they occasionally produce inaccurate or misleading results.

Despite these limitations, LLMs might be able to generate a valuable set of initial arguments. Humans can use this initial output as a starting point or study the data retrieved to craft better, more nuanced questions.

{{story_help_text}}
Placeholder image

{{r.time_ago}}
{{comment_help_text}}
Placeholder image

{{r.body}}
{{r.time_ago}}

Overview